 |
|
 |

FINANCIAL
REVIEW
I
am pleased to present the University’s Statement of Accounts for
the year ended 31 July 2003. The Accounts, which also incorporate the
results of the subsidiary and associated companies, comply with the Statement
of Recommended Practice for Accounting in Higher and Further Education
Institutions and the Accounts Direction of the Higher Education Funding
Council for England. They have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP,
Registered Auditors, whose report is unqualified.
The
most significant event during the year was the acquisition of the former
British Gas Research and Technology Centre, which occupies a site adjacent
to the University of obvious strategic importance. A substantial part
of the site will continue to be occupied by Advantica Limited, the successors
to the research and development arm of British Gas. The remainder will
be used to accommodate some of the growing number of industrial partnerships
and spin-out activities presently being developed. I consider that the
exploitation of our intellectual property through collaboration with industry
and commerce is potentially a highly profitable area for the University.
The acquisition was financed with a mixture of grants from the Science
Research Investment Fund and the East Midlands Development Agency together
with a long-term loan from Yorkshire Bank PLC. In the short-term, the
acquisition will place an additional burden on our finances, whilst the
University realises its plans for occupation.
Besides
acquiring Holywell Park, substantial progress was made towards realising
the sports facilities which comprise the Loughborough Network Centre of
the English Institute of Sport. In addition to those already in the pipeline,
we were selected to house the English Cricket Academy. Altogether, our
capital spending reached almost £60 million, placing considerable
demands on our cash flow. Whilst the cash movements during the year benefited
from lower working capital needs, some of these were due to fortuitous
timing of payments and the movements in 2003-04 will be much less favourable.
These capital developments have had an obvious impact on our Balance Sheet,
in particular our long-term debt. Whilst we still have a relatively strong
liquid position backed by unused credit facilities, the need to continue
generating cash is paramount. Servicing our long-term debt has now reached
the stage where Funding Council approval is required and was given during
the year. We have targets for both debt servicing and liquidity; both
were met at the end of the year.
The underlying revenue position remains sound. Continued expansion of
our international student numbers is proving very important in balancing
the continued pressure on funding of home students; the increased risk
exposure this entails is being actively managed. Overall, student recruitment
and retention remains robust. The increased turnover from research grants
and contracts is pleasing and our forward orders in this area are strong.
However, these results mask the fact that not all our activities are equally
profitable; research is critical to our future success, but it does not
usually pay its way. The reality is that much of our surplus is the result
of successful non-core activities like CASCAiD Limited and our conference
operations. The surplus before exceptional items was almost 3%, which
is in line with the target in our Financial Strategy and is based on historical
cost valuations of fixed assets. I fully support the policy which requires
surpluses to be generated, whilst at the same time welcoming a strategic
move towards revenue investment as well as capital. There are a number
of important initiatives to be financed if we are to realise our strategic
aims.
The
Income and Expenditure Account contains a number of abnormal items which
need to be understood. A large amount of asbestos in a group of buildings
was a major operational problem and we dealt with it by spending £1.5
million on remedial treatment. The acquisition of Holywell Park involved
some initial costs which will be covered by associated income, once the
buildings are fully occupied; these have been recognised in the Accounts
as an operating expense. The planned future closure of our operations
in Peterborough incurred some termination costs which we have also been
recognised in the 2002-03 Accounts. Some minor property transactions have
also occurred during the year and contributed to the surplus.
We spend considerable amounts of time and effort on managing risks. Our
growing dependence on international recruitment is well-recognised. Now
that we are net borrowers, our exposure to higher interest rates is largely
hedged. We review all the major risks on a regular and systematic basis,
taking care to manage rather than just avoid them. But shocks still come
and the moderation of the Funding Council grant for 2003-04 to allow us
to adjust to a lower level of grant from that source, was totally unexpected.
We recruit high quality students who complete their courses successfully
and readily find jobs on graduation. This does not fit well with Government
priorities, so we do not qualify well for funding streams directed to
improving access to higher education and improved retention of those who
are recruited. I fear that we have not heard the last of these developments
either.
Being
fresh to the affairs of the University, I can take an objective view of
its situation. I have found its finances stable and under control. The
success of the University’s wider academic and other strategies
underpin that position and are the real key to our continued financial
stability. The University’s reputation, especially its international
reputation, is critical to the achievement of many of its objectives.
Recruitment of students is an obvious one, but developing world-class
research means seeing the world as our audience. Maintaining our leading
position in industrial and commercial partnerships flows directly from
our reputation for outstanding teaching and research, which is highly
relevant to the needs of our customers. Successfully realising these objectives
will require both revenue and capital investment and I look forward to
that challenge.
Alan A Woods
University Treasurer
| INCOME AND EXPENDITURE |
2002-03
(£'000) |
2001-02
(£'000) |
|
INCOME
Funding Council grants
Academic fees and support grants
Research grants and contracts
Other operating income
Endowments and interest
Total Income
EXPENDITURE
Staff costs
Deprication
Other operating expenses
Interest payable
Taxation
Total Expenditure
Allocations to capitol
funds, departmental
balances and general reserves
BALANCE SHEET
Fixed assets
Endowment investments
Net current assets
Long-term creditors
Provisions
Total Net Assets
Represented by:
Deferred capital grants
Specific endowments
Reserves
Total Funds
CASH FLOW
Net cash inflow from operating
activities
Returns on investment and servicing
of finance
Taxation
Capital expenditure and financial
investment
Cash (outflow) before use
of liquid
resources and financing
Management of liquid resources
Financing
(Decrease) Increase in
cash balances
|
47,816
27,101
27,592
32,837
1,178
136,524
75,480
5,500
49,856
1,870
-
132,706
3,818
145,896
1,508
15,953
(55,075)
(2,205)
106,077
49,959
1,508
54,610
106,077
49,959
1,508
54,610
106,077
(22,989)
(533)
29,629
6,107
|
44,875
22,279
24,911
28,402
1,402
121,869
71,069
5,847
41,323
1,449
(11)
119,869
2,192
91,817
1,634
15,327
(26,312)
(2,643)
79,823
27,397
1,634
50,792
79,823
9,0269
161
(39)
(11,937)
(2,789)
4,437
(1,061)
587
|
| |